When people hear the phrase grooming behavior, they often think it has something to do with appearance, neatness, or hygiene. But in the workplace it means something completely different. It refers to subtle actions someone uses to blur boundaries, gain influence, or create a sense of obligation. It usually starts quietly which is why so many people miss the early signs.

Grooming behavior is not always dramatic. It often comes wrapped in friendliness, praise, or offers to help. Sometimes it even looks supportive at first. But the intention behind it is to slowly shift power and control in a relationship. Awareness is what helps employees stay grounded and confident in how they respond.

Let us walk through what grooming looks like in real life, and what you can do if you ever find yourself in one of these situations.

Common Grooming Behaviors at Work

Special attention that seems excessive:

Someone suddenly becomes unusually invested in one person but not others. They check in constantly, show up uninvited, or offer help that feels unnecessary.

Example:
A team member keeps stopping by a colleague’s desk with small gifts or treats even after being told it is not needed.

Comments that cross professional comfort levels:

These are the comments that make someone pause. They may sound like compliments, but they feel too personal or repeated too often.

Example:
A coworker repeatedly tells someone they look great today even though the person clearly does not enjoy the remarks.

Creating a sense of obligation:

This is one of the most common grooming tactics. The person reminds others of favors they did and uses this to pressure them into doing things they normally would decline.

Example:
“Remember when I stayed late to help you finish that report. You should really help me with this project today.”

Isolating the person through private conversations:

They push for private chats, after hours calls, or one on one meetings that are not necessary for the role.

Example:
They insist a discussion must be handled privately even though it involves work tasks that could easily be discussed in the team.

Realistic Workplace Scenarios

Scenario 1 – Creating a sense of obligation

Riya’s coworker constantly reminds her of the time he helped her finish a deadline. Now he pressures her to stay late to help him with unrelated tasks. She feels cornered and worries that saying no will seem ungrateful.

What Riya can do:
* Politely but firmly set limits.
* Say something simple like “I appreciate the help that day, but I cannot commit to this.”
* Document the pattern to notice if it continues.
* Speak to her manager early if she feels pressured again.

Scenario 2 – Documenting and raising concerns

After weeks of pressure, Riya notices the pattern repeating. She begins writing down dates, comments, and situations. She then speaks to HR to describe how the behavior makes her feel.

Why this helps:
Documentation brings clarity. It creates a timeline. It shows the difference between a one time favor and repeated pressure. It allows HR to act with clear information.

Scenario 3 – Witness support

Riya’s teammates start noticing the uncomfortable interactions. Instead of ignoring them they check in. They validate her feelings and offer to join meetings or be present whenever she needs.

Why this matters:
Support reduces fear. It helps the person feel seen and not isolated. A witness offering to be present can stop grooming patterns from escalating.

How Employees Can Respond

• Trust your instincts – If something feels off it usually is. Discomfort is a helpful signal.
• Set clear boundaries – Simple statements like “I prefer to keep this professional” or “I am not comfortable with this” are enough. Boundaries do not require long explanations.
• Limit unnecessary one on one interactions – If private conversations feel pressured, ask to include another colleague or move the discussion to a visible space.
• Document what happens – Write down dates, comments, and circumstances. Documentation keeps emotions separate from facts.
• Speak early with HR or a manager – You do not need proof. You only need to express concern. The earlier the conversation happens, the easier it is to address.

How Colleagues Can Help

* Pay attention to dynamics that feel unbalanced
* Ask the person if they want support in meetings
* Speak up if you notice boundary crossing
* Encourage them to talk to HR
* Reinforce that their feelings are valid

Supportive teams create psychological safety long before problems escalate.

Final Thoughts

Grooming behavior does not always arrive as a large problem. It often begins with small moments that feel slightly uncomfortable. The goal is not to become suspicious of everyone but to stay aware of patterns that gradually cross personal and professional boundaries.

Healthy workplaces are built on clarity and respect.
Recognizing grooming behavior early allows people to stay confident, safe, and supported. When teams speak openly about these patterns everyone benefits.

For more blogs and articles, visit our official website. Contact us for workshops and queries related to POSH, EAP (Employee Assistance Program) , Diversity and Inclusion and Code Of Conduct.

The post Grooming Behavior at Work : What It Really Means and How to Handle It appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.

In PoSH compliance, one question repeatedly challenges Internal Committees HR leaders and employers.

Does this incident fall within the scope of the PoSH Act?

Often incidents are dismissed simply because they occurred outside office premises or beyond office hours.
This is precisely where the Direct Nexus Test becomes critical.

The test helps determine whether an incident has a legally actionable connection to the workplace even if it did not occur within the physical office.

What is the Direct Nexus Test

The Direct Nexus Test asks one core question.

Is there a clear causal connection between the alleged conduct and the workplace or employment relationship

The focus is not on location or time.
The focus is on connection power and consequence.

An incident is considered work related when it is linked to
– The employment relationship
– Workplace hierarchy or authority
– Work enabled access or proximity
– Official work duties travel or events
– Impact on dignity safety or participation at work

If work created the context or power that enabled the conduct a direct nexus exists.

Legal foundation under the PoSH Act

The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Prevention Prohibition and Redressal Act 2013 adopts a deliberately broad definition of workplace.

It includes any place visited by the employee arising out of or during the course of employment.

This covers
– Work travel
– Offsite meetings
– Client locations
– Employer arranged transport
– Work related digital communication

The legislative intent is clear. Employee safety cannot be confined to office walls.

Supreme Court clarity on nexus and limitation

Vaneeta Patnaik v. Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti

A significant judicial interpretation of the Direct Nexus Test came from the Supreme Court in Vaneeta Patnaik v. Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti, decided on 12 September 2025.

Case summary

Ms Vaneeta Patnaik a faculty member at the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences filed a sexual harassment complaint against Dr Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti the then Vice Chancellor.

She alleged a series of unwelcome sexual advances between 2019 and April 2023.
She further claimed that administrative actions taken against her later were retaliatory for rejecting those advances.

The complaint was filed on 26 December 2023.

Procedural history

The Local Complaints Committee dismissed the complaint as time barred since the last alleged incident occurred in April 2023.

A Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court overturned this decision holding that a continuing hostile work environment extended the limitation period.

The Division Bench reversed the Single Judge order and restored the LCC dismissal.

The matter was then taken to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court ruling

The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench decision.

It ruled that under Section 9 of the PoSH Act a complaint must be filed within three months of the last incident.
This period may be extended by another three months only if sufficient cause is shown.

Since the complaint was filed nearly eight months after the last alleged incident it exceeded the maximum permissible limitation period.

Key legal principles clarified by the Court

Limitation under the PoSH Act is strict

The Court emphasised that statutory timelines cannot be diluted casually.
Limitation is a substantive requirement under the PoSH Act.

Continuing wrong versus subsequent administrative actions

This distinction is central to the Direct Nexus Test.

The Court clarified that

• A continuing wrong must flow directly from the sexual harassment
• Subsequent institutional or administrative decisions do not automatically qualify

In this case the administrative actions taken after April 2023 were held to be institutional decisions without a direct causal connection to the alleged harassment.

As a result they could not extend the limitation period as a continuing wrong.

In simple terms,

• Not every adverse action after harassment is a continuation of harassment.
• Only actions with a demonstrable direct nexus qualify.

Applying the Direct Nexus Test in practice

Example 1 Harassment during work travel

A senior employee harasses a junior colleague during an official business trip.

The travel is mandated by the employer
The accommodation is work arranged
The power equation exists solely due to employment

A direct nexus exists.
The incident falls squarely under the PoSH Act.

Example 2 Transfer after rejection of advances

An employee is transferred after refusing a senior colleague.

The critical question is not whether the transfer was inconvenient.
It is whether the transfer was causally linked to the rejection of advances.

If retaliation is demonstrable a direct nexus exists.
If the transfer is a routine administrative decision without causal linkage limitation does not extend.

This distinction was clearly reinforced by the Supreme Court.

Example 3 Digital harassment outside office hours

A senior repeatedly sends unwelcome messages to a subordinate using professional access.

The relationship exists only because of work.
The power imbalance is workplace created.

Time and location are irrelevant.
A direct nexus is established.

Why the Direct Nexus Test matters for organisations

• When organisations misapply this test they often.
• Dismiss valid complaints as personal disputes.
• Avoid uncomfortable inquiries.
• Create silence fear and disengagement.
• When applied correctly the test enables.
• Fair jurisdictional decisions by Internal Committees.
• Consistent legally defensible outcomes.
• Greater employee trust in redressal systems.

The Direct Nexus Test is not about expanding liability. It is about owning responsibility where work enables harm.

Conclusion

The Direct Nexus Test shifts PoSH compliance from a location focused lens to a connection focused one.

The Supreme Court ruling in Vaneeta Patnaik reinforces two important truths

• Limitation under the PoSH Act must be respected
• Nexus must be real demonstrable and causal

For employers and Internal Committees the most important question remains

Did work create the power access or context that made this conduct possible?

That is where meaningful PoSH accountability truly begins.

For more blogs and articles, visit our official website. Contact us for workshops and queries related to POSH, EAP (Employee Assistance Program) , Diversity and Inclusion and Code Of Conduct.

The post Understanding the Direct Nexus Test under the PoSH Act : Legal meaning, Judicial clarity and Workplace relevance appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.

Creating safe, respectful, and harassment-free workplaces is no longer optional — it is a legal, ethical, and cultural imperative. As companies strive to strengthen their PoSH compliance and uphold employee safety, Internal Committees (ICs) play a crucial role in ensuring fair investigations and meaningful corrective actions.

However, in my work with organisations across industries, I have observed a troubling trend:
one perpetrator repeatedly harassing multiple colleagues over a period of time.

Most ICs conclude the case with termination – and while this protects the immediate workplace, a deeper question arises:

Are we solving the problem… or simply relocating it?

When a guilty individual is terminated without any behavioural reform, the risk doesn’t go away.
An unreformed perpetrator is released into society, potentially joining another organisation and continuing the same pattern of harassment.

As experts committed to safe work cultures, our responsibility must go beyond punitive action.
We must focus on rehabilitation, behavioural correction, and long-term risk mitigation.

This is why I strongly advocate that ICs consider mandating counselling for perpetrators of sexual harassment, whether or not they remain employed.

Below are three essential questions organisations must evaluate carefully.

Are counselling therapies like CBT and relapse-prevention models effective for perpetrators of sexual harassment?

Research across behavioural sciences, criminal psychology, and workplace misconduct studies shows that structured counselling – particularly Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) – is effective in addressing the root causes of inappropriate behaviour.

CBT and relapse-prevention programs help offenders:

• Identify and reframe distorted thinking patterns
• Understand power dynamics and entitlement beliefs
• Recognize emotional and behavioural triggers
• Build empathy and accountability
• Develop healthier behavioural alternatives

These evidence-based therapies are widely used for preventing repeat sexual offences and workplace misconduct. While not a standalone cure, counselling provides a structured path toward behavioural change – something termination alone cannot achieve.

Can counselling reduce repeat harassment? How many sessions are typically required?

Yes – counselling can significantly reduce recidivism among sexual offenders when delivered through a consistent, structured program.

Key findings from global research:

• Long-term, multi-session interventions are far more effective than one-off sessions
• CBT-based treatment models show measurable reductions in repeat sexual harassment and misconduct
• Behavioural reform often requires 8–20 sessions or more, depending on the nature and severity of the behaviour
• The offender’s willingness to participate is the strongest predictor of success

Counselling is most effective when the goal is not only to correct behaviour, but to reshape the mindset that led to the harassment.

If the IC mandates counselling, can counsellors provide progress reports to the IC or management?

Yes – with boundaries.

While counsellors must maintain confidentiality, they can provide structured progress summaries when counselling is mandated as part of corrective action under the PoSH framework. These updates typically include:

• Attendance and participation levels
• Willingness to engage and reflect
• Observable behavioural shifts or persistent challenges
• Recommendations for continued support or risk mitigation

High-level reports ensure ethical transparency while enabling organisations to make informed decisions about safety, reintegration, or separation.

Confidentiality is respected – and workplace safety is preserved.

Why Mandating Counselling Is a Responsible Organisational Practice

Simply terminating a harasser may feel like a clean solution, but it does not address the behavioural issue at its core.
To truly break the cycle of harassment, organisations must adopt a more holistic approach.

Mandated counselling helps:

• Reduce the risk of repeated harassment
• Address underlying behavioural and psychological factors
• Reinforce organisational commitment to responsible PoSH implementation
• Protect future workplaces and communities
• Build a culture of accountability and reform—not just compliance

A workplace becomes safer not just by removing misconduct, but by preventing its recurrence.

Instead of discarding the “bad apple,” we must invest in understanding and correcting the behaviour – for the sake of all workplaces that individual may enter in the future.

Conclusion

As organisations mature in their PoSH implementation, it is time to expand the IC lens from punitive measures to preventive and rehabilitative strategies. Counselling is not a soft option –  it is a scientifically grounded, ethically responsible, and legally permissible corrective tool.

By mandating counselling for perpetrators, we not only ensure justice within our organisations but also contribute to building safer workplaces across society.

The post Why Organizations Should Mandate Counselling for Sexual Harassment Perpetrators – An IC Expert’s Perspective appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.

In modern workplaces, photography has become routine. Team-building events, celebrations, offsites, and even casual days at work often lead to employees clicking pictures of one another. But Indian law has become significantly stricter about photo privacy, especially after the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act) 2023.

This raises two critical workplace questions:

1. Is it legally permissible to take photographs of colleagues at work?
2. Is it permissible to post or share those photographs on social media or messaging platforms?

Legally, both actions require clear, voluntary, informed consent, and failing to comply can lead to serious civil and criminal consequences.

Why Photo Privacy Matters in the Workplace

Workplaces are not public spaces; they are professional environments where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy. A simple photo, when shared without consent, can lead to:

• Mental distress
• Workplace harassment
• Damage to professional reputation
• Misuse on digital platforms
• Legal liability for individuals and organisations

With stricter laws under the DPDP Act, organisations must treat photographs as personal data and ensure responsible handling.

1. Is It Legal to Take Pictures of Colleagues at Work?

Not without consent.

Under the DPDP Act 2023, photographs qualify as personal data. Capturing a person’s image without clear consent is considered unauthorised data processing.

In a workplace setting, this means:

• Clicking candid images of colleagues without informing them is not permitted.
• Photographing employees during events requires upfront disclosure.
• Consent must be voluntary, specific, and documented wherever possible.

Repeatedly photographing a colleague after they object can also be considered:

• Harassment
• Stalking under IPC Section 354D
• Violation of the constitutional right to privacy

2. Is It Legal to Share or Post Workplace Photos of Colleagues?

No. Sharing requires explicit, informed consent.

This includes sharing photos on:

• WhatsApp groups
• LinkedIn
• Instagram
• Company social media pages
• Internal newsletters
• Websites, brochures, and promotional material

Once a photo is published, the legal responsibility increases because it becomes data dissemination and may trigger various provisions of the DPDP Act, IT Act, and IPC.

Even if someone permitted you to take their picture, that does not mean they consent to publication. This distinction has been repeatedly reaffirmed by Indian courts.

Legal Framework Governing Workplace Photography in India

1. Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act) 2023

The DPDP Act treats photos and videos as personal data. Any individual or organisation that collects, stores, or shares images becomes a Data Fiduciary and must:

• Obtain explicit consent
• Limit use to the stated purpose
• Ensure safe storage and processing
• Delete data upon request
• Notify individuals of their rights

Violations can result in:

• Investigations by the Data Protection Board
• Heavy monetary penalties
• Reputational and compliance consequences

2. Information Technology Act, 2000

Section 66E – Privacy Violation

Criminalises capturing, publishing, or transmitting images of private body parts without consent.
Punishment: Up to 3 years imprisonment or fine up to Rs. 2 lakh, or both.

Sections 67 and 67A – Obscene and Sexually Explicit Content

Criminalise publication or transmission of sexually explicit or obscene images.
Punishments range from 3 to 5 years imprisonment and significant fines.

3. Indian Penal Code (IPC)

Section 354C – Voyeurism

Watching, capturing, or sharing private moments without consent.
Punishment: 1 to 3 years for first offence; higher for repeat offences.

Section 509 – Outraging the Modesty of a Woman

Posting a woman’s photograph without consent, in a way that causes insult or harassment.
Punishment: Up to 3 years imprisonment and fine.

Section 500 – Defamation

Sharing images that damage someone’s reputation.
Punishment: Up to 2 years imprisonment and/or fine.

4. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution – Right to Privacy

The Puttaswamy Judgment (2017) firmly established privacy as a fundamental right.
Unauthorised photography or sharing of images in a workplace environment can qualify as a violation of Article 21, enabling individuals to approach High Courts or the Supreme Court.

Workplace Scenarios: What is Allowed and What is Not?

Scenario 1: Group Photo at a Team Lunch

Permitted only if all individuals have given consent to be photographed.

Scenario 2: Posting Team Outing Pictures on LinkedIn

Requires prior consent from every person visible in the image.

Scenario 3: Photographing a Colleague Without Their Knowledge

Not permitted. Violates DPDP Act and privacy rights.

Scenario 4: Sharing Photos on Messaging Apps Without Checking

Illegal if recipients did not consent.
Could trigger IPC 509, IPC 500, or even IT Act sections depending on misuse.

Scenario 5: Company Using Employee Photos in Recruitment or Marketing Collateral

Requires separate written consent, distinct from routine HR or joining documentation.

Scenario 6: Employee Repeatedly Taking Photos After Requests to Stop

Considered harassment or stalking under IPC 354D.

Relevant Case Laws Strengthening Photo Privacy

1. Puttaswamy vs Union of India (2017)

The Supreme Court held that privacy is intrinsic to Article 21. Any unauthorised photography can violate this right.

2. Cases Under Section 66E (IT Act)

Courts have ruled that photographing or circulating images without consent, even outside traditionally private spaces, violates privacy.

3. Judicial Interpretation of Consent

Several High Courts have emphasised that:
Consent to being photographed is not equal to consent to publication.
This is critical for workplaces that use photos for branding or social media.

What Offences Can Non-Consensual Workplace Photography Lead To?

What Should Employees and Organisations Do?

For Employees

• Always seek permission before taking photos.
• Never post workplace images without explicit approval.
• Respect colleagues who prefer not to be photographed.

For Organisations

• Include a Photo and Video Policy in the Code of Conduct.
• Use DPDP-compliant consent forms for events, training sessions, and marketing use.
• Display notices when photography or videography will occur.
• Train employees on digital hygiene and workplace privacy.
• Provide clear channels for grievances related to photo misuse.

What to Do If Your Photo Privacy Is Violated

1. Request immediate takedown from the individual or platform.
2. Escalate to HR or the Internal Committee (if harassment is involved).
3. File a complaint under DPDP Act with the Data Protection Board.
4. Approach Cyber Crime Cell under IT Act provisions.
5. Seek constitutional remedy through the High Court for Article 21 violations.

Conclusion: Photo Privacy Is a Legal and Ethical Responsibility in Workplaces

Workplace photography must be governed by consent, transparency, and respect. With the DPDP Act 2023, Indian law has made it clear that employees have the right to control their images, and misuse—intentional or accidental—can lead to serious legal consequences.

In high-trust workplaces, respecting photo privacy is essential not only for compliance but for building a safe, inclusive, and psychologically secure culture.

For more blogs and articles, visit our official website. Contact us for workshops and queries related to POSH, EAP (Employee Assistance Program) , Diversity and Inclusion and Code Of Conduct.

The post Workplace Photo Privacy in India: Is It Legal to Click or Share Photos of Colleagues? appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in its recent directive (August 2025), has mandated that all States and Union Territories conduct a district-wise survey within six weeks to verify whether organizations have complied with the POSH Act, 2013—specifically, the constitution of Internal Committees (ICs) at workplaces.

Key Highlights of the Directive:

• • A district-wise survey will be conducted by Labour Commissioners and District Authorities.
  • Verification will include whether Internal Committees (ICs) are formed and functional in workplaces.
  • Non-compliance may lead to denial of license renewals/registrations for establishments.
  • Applies to all public and private organizations.

Action Points for Organization:

• Verify IC Constitution: Ensure our IC is duly constituted with external members and updated details.
• Documentation: Maintain IC meeting minutes, awareness sessions conducted, and annual reports.
• Reporting: Update details on SHe-Box portal and keep records ready for inspection. More details on the She-Box portal can be referred here https://cecureus.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-she-box-portal-update/
• Training & Awareness: Refresh POSH training for employees and IC members before survey initiation.

Let us treat this with urgency to ensure full compliance and readiness for upcoming district-level surveys. Additional details on mandatory POSH Compliance for Companies can be found here – https://cecureus.com/mandatory-posh-compliance-for-companies-from-july-14-2025/

 References:

https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2023/22553/22553_2023_6_11_61891_Order_21-May-2025.pdf

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-directs-district-wise-survey-to-ascertain-posh-act-compliance-by-employers-300702

https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/08/19/posh-act-compliance-supreme-court-conduct-district-wise-survey-setting-up-icc/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Need support with POSH compliance?

At Cecureus, we help organizations with:

• IC constitution & training, PoSH audit, Surveys.
• POSH awareness workshops
• Compliance surveys & reporting
• End-to-end support for legal compliance

Please reach out to us for setting up the POSH Compliance for your organization!

For more blogs and articles, visit our official website. Contact us for workshops and queries related to POSH, EAP (Employee Assistance Program) , Diversity and Inclusion and Code Of Conduct.

The post Supreme Court Directive – Mandatory District-Wise POSH Compliance Survey appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.

The Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD) has recently launched an enhanced version of the SHe-Box portal (https://shebox.wcd.gov.in/)  to improve compliance under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act).

This upgraded platform now serves as a centralized repository for complaint management and Internal Committee (IC) details across organizations in India.

Its purpose can be understood through several key objectives and features:

• Single‑window complaint filing: It enables any woman—whether in the public or private sector, including formal, informal, or unorganized work—to register complaints of workplace sexual harassment online
• Secure & confidential handling: The portal masks the identity of the complainant—only the IC/LC Chairperson can see complaint details—to preserve confidentiality
• Direct delivery to Internal/Local Committees (IC/LC): Complaints registered in the portal are routed automatically to the relevant Internal committee of the complainants workplace. If a workplace committee is not registered, the portal notifies nodal officers to ensure timely registration
• Complaint tracking: Complainants receive a tracking ID and can monitor the status of their complaint in real-time online
• Centralized monitoring & data repository: The portal maintains records of all ICs/LCs and complaint statistics across India, allowing government authorities to track filings, disposal, and pending cases
• Enhancing employer accountability: Employers must register their IC details, upload compliance reports, and ensure timely committee action to fulfill PoSH obligations

Salient Features

• Digital access across sectors: Available to women in public, private, organized, and unorganized sectors
• Bi-/multilingual support: Provides resources and compliance information in Hindi and English; regional-language support remains limited
• Time-bound inquiry enforcement: PoSH mandates the IC/LC investigate and resolve a complaint within 90 days, enforced via the portal’s monitoring dashboards
• Employer compliance management: Organizations upload annual PoSH compliance reports, training records, and IC member details via the portal

⚖️ Supreme Court Direction on Mandatory Disclosure

In the case of Aureliano Fernandes Vs State of Goa & Ors, the Hon’ble Supreme Court directed that all establishments with more than 10 employees must ensure their Internal Committee (IC) and Nodal Officer details are uploaded to the SHe-Box portal, in line with the requirements of the POSH Act. 

🏢 What’s New for Private Sector Organizations?

With the recent update, private organizations can now register on the SHe-Box portal. While registration is not currently mandatory, it is strongly recommended as a proactive compliance measure and to ensure readiness for future regulatory expectations. 

📝 How to Register on the SHe-Box Portal: Step-by-Step

1. Visit the SHe-Box Portal
2. Select “Private Head Office Registration”
3. Fill in all required details including:

3. • Nodal Officer’s name and contact
   • Presiding Officer/Legal Officer/Compliance Officer details

4. Upload the necessary organizational documents
5. Submit the form

Private-Head-Office-User-Manual – The reference guide (User Manual) to register on the SHe-Box portal.

📩 What Happens After Registration?

• A “Registration Successful” notification will appear on the screen.
• You will receive an acknowledgment email confirming your submission.
• Within 7–10 working days, login credentials will be shared via email.

🔄 Post-Login: Key Action Points

Once you receive login access:

1. Update the Internal Committee (IC) details for your head office.
2. If your organization has branch offices, navigate to the ‘Workplace’ section in the portal and:

2. • Add each branch office
   • Upload branch-specific IC details separately

Keeping this information up to date ensures complete and transparent compliance with POSH Act requirements.

In Summary:

Frequently asked questions:

Why Should You Register?

Even though registration is not mandatory yet, it’s a best practice that helps your organization:

• Ensure regulatory alignment
• Strengthen POSH governance
• Enhance trust and transparency
• Be prepared for audits and inspections

For more details please refer here – https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx

Should all companies, institutions, factories etc. register? 

Is it mandatory to register? 

In which all states is it mandatory to register? 

Should I register for each of my branch offices? 

By when should I register? 

The post Everything You Need to Know About the New SHe-Box Portal Update appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.

Starting July 14, 2025, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has rolled out new compliance requirements aimed at improving workplace safety and accountability. As part of these changes, companies will now need to include detailed disclosures about sexual harassment complaints in their Board Reports.

These updates come under the Companies (Accounts) Second Amendment Rules, 2025, as notified by Notification No. G.S.R. 357(E) dated May 30, 2025

Here is what is changing- 

Mandatory Disclosure of Sexual Harassment Complaints:

Under the revised rules, companies are now required to make specific disclosures in their Board Reports related to sexual harassment at the workplace.

As per Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the amended Rule 8(5)(a) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, companies must:

i. Provide a statement that the Company has complied with the provisions constituting an Internal Committee under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. 

ii. Disclose the following details regarding the complaints of sexual harassment:

1. Number of sexual harassment complaints received in the year
2. Number of complaints disposed off in the year
3. Number of cases pending more than 90 days.

Consequences of Non-compliance:

Non-compliance with these provisions can lead to penalties under Section 134(8) of the Companies Act, 2013. The fines are as follows:

• Company – ₹3,00,000
• Every officer in default: ₹50,000

However, certain relief is provided to companies of specific categories such as One Person Companies, Small Companies and Startups wherein the penalty is halved and is subject to the maximum limits below:

• Company – INR 2,00,000
• Officer in default – INR 1,00,000

Changes in a nutshell: 

 It is noteworthy that the previous mandate was a superficial and general one while the changes bring in stricter reporting and encourage better enforcement and oversight. The notification also serves as a reminder that POSH at the workplace is more than a checklist activity. Companies must be proactive in ensuring compliance to the POSH Act as well as take steps to ensure workplaces are safer for all.

Official Resources

•  https://www.mca.gov.in/content/mca/global/en/acts-rules/ebooks/notifications.html

• MCA-Notification-regarding-Companies-Accounts-Second-Amendment-Rules-2025-dated-30.05.2025 (1)

Please reach out to us for any queries on Mandatory POSH Compliance for Companies.

For more blogs and articles, visit our official website. Contact us for workshops and queries related to POSH, EAP (Employee Assistance Program) , Diversity and Inclusion and Code Of Conduct.

The post Mandatory POSH Compliance for Companies from July 14, 2025 appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.

In workplaces across India, the implementation of the PoSH Act, 2013 (Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace) is not just about policies and posters — it’s about ensuring that survivors feel heard and that complaints are handled with fairness and thoroughness. A critical part of this process? Witnesses.

But not all witnesses are the same.

Let’s explore how different types of witnesses play a role in sexual harassment inquiries, using a real-world-inspired scenario — and the legal position when there are no witnesses except the victim.

🔍 The Scenario:

An employee, Rhea, files a complaint of sexual harassment against her manager, Karan, alleging that he made inappropriate comments and touched her without consent during an office party. She submits her complaint to the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC).

Here’s how various types of witnesses might come into play:

👁️‍🗨️ 1. Eyewitness

Who: A colleague who was present at the party and directly saw the inappropriate behavior.
Example: “I saw Karan put his arm around Rhea even though she looked visibly uncomfortable.”
Value: High — provides firsthand, direct evidence.

🗣️ 2. Hearsay Witness

Who: Someone who didn’t witness the incident but heard about it from others.
Example: “The next day, my teammate told me that Karan had misbehaved with Rhea.”
Value: Limited — often not admissible as primary evidence, but may be used to support patterns or provide leads.

💔 3. Victim Witness

Who: The complainant, Rhea herself.
Role: Shares her account, emotions, and the impact of the harassment.
Value: Central to the case — her testimony initiates the inquiry.

🎯 4. Expert Witness

Who: A psychologist or counselor, if Rhea sought therapy.
Example: “Rhea experienced emotional distress and anxiety post-incident.”
Value: Adds credibility to the psychological impact of the incident.

📸 5. Corroborative Witness

Who: A co-worker who didn’t see the act but noticed Rhea’s distress afterward.
Example: “She was crying in the restroom after the party.”
Value: Strengthens the narrative by supporting emotional or behavioral aftermath.

📜 6. Character Witness

Who: A person speaking about either party’s behavior patterns.
Example (for Rhea): “She’s always been professional and focused on work.”
Example (for Karan): “He has a history of crossing boundaries at office events.”
Value: Can establish credibility or pattern of conduct.

❓ 7. Hostile or Adverse Witness

Who: Someone initially cooperative but turns evasive or defensive.
Example: A friend of the accused who denies everything and shows aggression during questioning.
Value: Can still provide useful insights, especially if their behavior indicates bias or conflict of interest.

👀 8. Circumstantial Witness

Who: Someone who observed surrounding events or context.
Example: “Karan had been drinking heavily that night and followed Rhea around.”
Value: Offers indirect evidence that helps paint the full picture.

⚖️ What if there is no other witness? Is victim’s word enough?

Yes — the sole testimony of the victim can be enough under Indian law if it is trustworthy and consistent.

🧑‍⚖️ Relevant Case Law #1:

Vishaka & Others vs. State of Rajasthan (1997)
This landmark case led to the formation of the PoSH Act. The Supreme Court emphasized that a woman’s right to a safe workplace is fundamental, and that inquiries should not dismiss a complaint merely due to lack of witnesses.

🧑‍⚖️ Relevant Case Law #2:

Apparel Export Promotion Council vs. A.K. Chopra (1999)
The Supreme Court held that even attempts at physical advances without successful contact can constitute sexual harassment.
Importantly, it stated that “a victim’s testimony must be given due weight” and should not be disbelieved solely due to lack of corroboration.

“The absence of eyewitnesses is not a ground to disbelieve the victim.”
— Supreme Court of India

📚 Other Case Laws Involving Witness Testimonies in PoSH Cases

🧑‍⚖️ Case Law #3: Dr. Punita K. Sodhi vs. Union of India (2010)

This case emphasized the importance of following due process during PoSH inquiries, including giving both parties the chance to bring witnesses.

The court ruled that the credibility of witnesses, their consistency, and the manner in which statements are recorded — all affect the final outcome.

🧑‍⚖️ Case Law #4: D.V. Apparao vs. V. Krishna Kumari (Andhra HC, 2005)

In this case, co-worker testimonies played a key role. The court ruled in favor of the complainant after corroborative witnesses confirmed behavioral patterns of the accused and supported the victim’s emotional response.

✅ What Should ICCs Take Away from This?

• A victim’s word carries weight — especially when credible, consistent, and delivered with clarity.
• The absence of witnesses does not invalidate a complaint.
• All types of witnesses — even those who saw the emotional impact, not the act itself — can be useful.
• ICCs must assess witness statements objectively, and avoid biases.
• Courts give high regard to due process: let the inquiry be fair, timely, and documented.

💡 Final Thoughts

In cases of sexual harassment, witnesses can make or break a case. But even when there are no witnesses, the law supports survivors — provided the ICC investigates thoroughly and fairly.

Let’s work toward a culture where truth is respected, not just proven, and where workplaces are safe for every individual — seen or unseen.

Please reach out to us for any queries on Types of Witnesses in PoSH Inquiries.

For more blogs and articles, visit our official website. Contact us for workshops and queries related to POSH, EAP (Employee Assistance Program) , Diversity and Inclusion and Code Of Conduct.

The post Who Saw What? Understanding Types of Witnesses in PoSH Inquiries appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.

1. Limited Bandwidth

One of the primary reasons for change can be the inability of the current member or officer to dedicate sufficient time and energy to their role. IC responsibilities require significant attention, from handling cases to raising awareness. If the individual is stretched too thin or unable to meet the demands, it may be time to bring in someone with the capacity to fulfill these obligations effectively.

2. Lengthy Tenure

Long tenures can lead to stagnation in any role, including IC positions. Introducing fresh leadership can bring new perspectives, ideas, and energy to the committee, ensuring its continued effectiveness. A rotation policy may also help prevent complacency and enhance the overall vibrancy of the IC.

3. Performance Gaps

Performance gaps in executing IC responsibilities can significantly impact the credibility and effectiveness of the committee. Whether it’s delays in case resolutions, lack of compliance with legal procedures, or insufficient engagement with stakeholders, addressing these gaps might require appointing a new member or officer.

4. Innovation Deficit

An IC thrives on proactive initiatives—whether it’s spreading awareness about workplace harassment policies or conducting training sessions for employees. If there’s a lack of impactful new initiatives, it could indicate an innovation deficit within the committee, prompting the need for change.

5. Behavioral Standards

The Presiding Officer and IC members serve as role models for organizational conduct. If an individual in this role is unable to uphold exemplary behavioral standards, it can erode trust and compromise the integrity of the committee. Organizations may need to reassess the suitability of such individuals in these critical roles.

6. Team Dynamics

A healthy team dynamic is essential for any committee’s success. If an IC member’s behavior or approach negatively affects team morale and cohesion, it could hinder the committee’s functioning. To maintain a collaborative and effective IC, addressing such issues is vital.

Conclusion

The Presiding Officer and IC members carry immense responsibility in ensuring a safe, harassment-free workplace. Regular evaluations and necessary changes to these roles ensure the committee remains effective, unbiased, and equipped to handle challenges. By addressing the factors mentioned above, organizations can reinforce their commitment to workplace safety and create an environment where every employee feels respected and secure.

Please reach out to us for any queries on Need for Change in the Presiding Officer or an IC Member.

For more blogs and articles, visit our official website. Contact us for workshops and queries related to POSH, EAP (Employee Assistance Program) , Diversity and Inclusion and Code Of Conduct.

The post Factors Prompting a Change in the Presiding Officer or an IC Member appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.

Host: Viji Hari

In this special episode of The Safe Space Podcast, host Viji Hari is joined by industry expert Ms. Jeevitha Shanmugam, the Head of HR at Kapitus. A seasoned and results-oriented HR professional, Jeevitha is renowned for improving retention, streamlining hiring practices, and helping organizations gain a competitive advantage. With extensive experience in the recruitment domain, she has worked across Fortune 500 companies, medium-sized enterprises, and startups. Together, Viji and Jeevitha will discuss a topic that impacts all organizations—creating safe workplaces. This episode is particularly significant, as today, December 9th, marks the 11th anniversary of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act coming into effect in 2013. It’s a fitting occasion to delve into this crucial subject and explore its ongoing impact.

Jeevitha’s  Journey  to Leadership

Jeevitha attributed her decision to pursue a career in HR to her innate ability to connect with people and build trust. She  views workplaces as “second homes,” where individuals spend a significant portion of their lives. Her commitment to fostering safe and inclusive environments stems from the belief that these spaces should not only function effectively but also be welcoming and respectful for everyone.

Having worked across diverse organizational cultures, Jeevitha has faced unique challenges, particularly related to cultural impacts and communication barriers. She emphasized the importance of addressing these issues to cultivate a culture of safety, diversity, and inclusion.

Addressing the Grey Areas

Jeevitha highlighted the challenges of addressing “gray areas” in workplace harassment cases. She recounted an incident where an employee raised a subtle concern about an uncomfortable conversation. While the complaint did not meet the strict criteria of sexual harassment, it carried undertones that warranted attention.

To address such cases, it is important to focus on building trust through open communication, gathering comprehensive evidence discreetly, and providing sensitivity training to the team. The individual who raised the concern was supported through counselling, while the person responsible underwent one-on-one coaching to understand organizational values and acceptable behaviour. This holistic approach not only resolved the issue but also set a precedent for handling ambiguous situations effectively.

Best Practices for Safe and Inclusive Workplaces

Jeevitha outlined several best practices organizations can adopt to create genuinely inclusive environments:

Leadership Commitment: Safe workplace initiatives must be championed by leaders. Setting an example at the top fosters a trickle-down effect, reinforcing policies and cultural values.

Policy Clarity and Communication: Clear, well-defined policies and open communication channels empower employees to report concerns. Regular sensitivity training ensures awareness and adherence.

Employee Support: Both complainants and respondents should receive adequate support. Counseling, therapy, and coaching can help address the emotional impact of harassment or false accusations.

Engagement and Feedback: Employee engagement through surveys, team activities, and HR connects helps identify red flags such as withdrawal, low collaboration, or high attrition. These indicators reflect the health of workplace culture.

Inclusive Strategies: Involve employees in designing and implementing inclusion strategies. This collaborative approach fosters a sense of belonging and encourages innovative solutions.

Red Flags in Workplace Culture

High attrition rates, low engagement in team activities, and lack of participation in organizational events like “Fun Fridays” are clear indicators of an unsafe or non-inclusive culture. Jeevitha emphasized the importance of addressing these issues proactively to ensure employees feel valued and included.

Bursting Myths Around Workplace Safety

Viji moves on to dispelling myths about workplace safety.

Myth#1 Workplace safety is only about preventing physical accidents.
Jeevitha quickly dismisses this, emphasizing that safety also includes psychological and mental well-being. She explains that psychological safety influences how people think and perform, making it essential to the workplace environment.

Myth#2 Safe and inclusive workplaces benefit only women or minority groups.
Jeevitha asserts that inclusion benefits everyone. A truly inclusive culture ensures that all employees feel valued and safe, fostering trust and respect across the board.

Myth#3 Creating a safe workplace is mainly HR’s responsibility.
Jeevitha clarifies that it is a shared responsibility, involving leaders, managers, and employees in building a safe culture.

Myth#4 If employees aren’t complaining, the workplace is safe.
Jeevitha warns that silence often stems from fear or a lack of trust. Organizations must actively foster trust and open communication through clear policies and regular awareness initiatives.

Myth#5 Talking about safety and inclusivity makes employees uncomfortable.
Jeevitha notes that stigma often prevents these discussions, but normalizing conversations about safety, just as we’ve done with topics like menstruation, can break barriers and promote inclusivity.

Minute Mentoring

In this segment, Viji and Jeevitha discuss practical, quick-fire insights on fostering safer and more inclusive workplaces.

The most important trait for a safe workplace?

Respect.

The biggest challenge in workplace inclusivity?

Unconscious bias. It often operates without our awareness.

The key to resolving workplace conflicts?

Effective communication. It’s the foundation for understanding, collaboration, and resolution.

Advice for victims ?

Speak up—taking that first step is crucial.

One word for employees to contribute to a safe space?

Trust.

Advice to young women starting their careers?

Embrace your unique perspectives. Own them, grow from them, and use them to propel your journey forward.

Viji wraps up the episode by expressing gratitude to Jeevitha for sharing her expertise on creating safe and inclusive workplaces. She emphasizes the importance of proactive leadership and collaboration in fostering a supportive work environment. The episode highlights the crucial role of HR in promoting workplace safety and inclusivity, encouraging ongoing efforts to build and maintain a positive workplace culture.

This episode of The SAFE SPACE Podcast underscores the significance of leadership commitment and practical strategies for creating safe spaces. We look forward to the next episode, and if you have any specific topics you’d like us to cover, please do write to us. If you’re interested in being a part of this podcast, we’d be happy to have you! You can reach out to me at viji@cecurus.com. Until next time, stay committed to creating inclusive and safe workplaces. Thank you and goodbye!

For more blogs and articles, visit our official website. Contact us for workshops and queries related to POSH, EAP (Employee Assistance Program) , Diversity and Inclusion and Code Of Conduct

The post Safe Space Podcast – Creating Safe Workplaces: Strategies and Best Practices appeared first on Prevention of Sexual Harassment, Inclusive Diversity, Employee Assistance Program | CecureUs | Chennai.